Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brent Hartinger's avatar

Evocative! And some great imagery. But I'm wondering if you're jumping around a bit too much. You have a number of different openings -- four, I counted (sorry!) -- and then proceed to a series of flashbacks. Why not open on a scene of action, the discovery of the journal? Then proceed to tell us THAT story in a solid chunk, let us engage.

As a general rule, action = interesting, exposition = boring. So I always use action to "buy time" in order to give exposition. This is a complicated one because you're telling two stories, but the same rules apply. Give us consistent steady ACTION to engage us with both stories (the two inciting events, both fleshed out) -- basically chapters one and two -- then you can give us the necessary exposition with subsequent chunks -- chapters three and four.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?